Following the drone inspection, a close-range façade inspection was carried out using rope access. The inspection locations were selected based on observations from the initial drone inspection, allowing areas of concern to be examined more closely and documented in greater detail.

The information gathered from both stages provided a clearer understanding of the façade condition. Findings were documented and assessed, with recommended actions established according to the condition of the different façade elements. These recommendations included appropriate repair, replacement, treatment, recoating or continued monitoring where required.

From Findings to Rectification

Importantly, the process does not simply end when the inspection is completed.

The findings provide a basis for the next stage — rectification planning and follow-up. Items requiring more urgent attention can be prioritised, while other repair and maintenance works can be properly planned and coordinated. This creates a clearer path from identifying an issue during inspection to determining the appropriate corrective action.

Supporting Better Façade Maintenance Planning

For property and facility managers, this highlights the importance of viewing façade inspection as part of a continuous maintenance process. Drone inspection can provide comprehensive visual coverage, while rope-access inspection enables selected areas to be examined at close range. Clear documentation then helps the relevant parties understand the findings, establish priorities and plan the next steps.

At ARIAS, we believe an effective inspection process should go beyond identifying areas of concern. By combining inspection technology, close-range assessment and structured follow-up, we aim to support a clearer journey from inspection findings to corrective action.

Inspect. Document. Prioritise. Follow through.